|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Jez Amatin
Enso Corp
4
   |
Posted - 2014.08.08 12:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
If only smartbombs could be used at 0 on a WH  |
Jez Amatin
Enso Corp
5
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 08:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
No really this is just as dumb for hunters as it is for preys, and i fail to understand the rationale behind restricting ship type in an environment that has fostered emergent game play.
but here are some ideas that may help mitigate the issues:
If wh is between j-space systems then make it a normal wh with no restrictions, although with the increase in connections i'm not sure we really need more...
add a description that reflects its mass limited
|
Jez Amatin
Enso Corp
7
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 20:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Argyle Wynter wrote:We did get a kill on a cruiser trying to go out a frigate hole  GÇô so the jumpable mass limitations on them does add an interesting new dynamic. We had a hilarious but also sad situation earlier which I was alluding to above - someone scouted a battleship fleet backed up with a carrier down the chain so we mobilised a fleet only to work out that any route of getting to them meant trying to get through a frigate only hole at some point :( we had a good laugh but it was also a pretty **** situation.
That is also the scenario i was getting at. In w-space, it helps neither hunter nor hunted. It is just a novelty which has no tangible connection with wormhole pvp meta. granted u can scan a route once u get a scout in, but the odds of you getting it are incredibly slim. especially when u factor in changes to rolling and mass-based wh spawning.
Make these k-space only and they might be at the very least mildly entertaining. Although i'm still not convinced they're anything but a futile change with no real insight into how these wh might influence both environments (as in both k & w space). |
Jez Amatin
Enso Corp
7
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 14:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
I still think there should be no frig holes between w-space systems, it makes no sense due to frigates being largely ineffective at pvp in w-space. if you are lucky you could maybe torp a ratter, but the odds are the sleepers will kill u first.
if you lose a pos to assault frigates, then i seriously suggest you put more guns up lol. |
Jez Amatin
Enso Corp
18
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 08:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Andiedeath wrote:LOL A frigate/destroyer gang could take out a carrier ratting in a C5 or Null Sec.... You can also run up to Class 4 wormhole sites or ratting in null sec in frigates with some reps if your into carebearing... Stop complaining and use these new wormholes to your advantage...
Keep up the great work CCP!
Although one thing I would love to see is a T2 Logi Frigate that does about 50% of the reps of a t1 Crusier equivalent.
As stated above, there are no solo ratting carriers in C5 space, and the sleepers would kill anyone who stayed on field long enough... its called escalations, and you dont yolo in your thanny. In null sec yes u might catch a thanny, but you would still need a fair few frigs and if the cap pilot isnt ******** he will refit and call in friends... So whilst possible, its still better to bring proper DPS to get the kill and GTFO before his mates turn up in cynabals and vagas.
C4 ratting in a frig gang. i can tell you that idea is, mildly entertaining, but still a complete waste of time.
Ratting in null in frigs, still dumb, and a waste of frigs.
Your ability to put together a rational argument for these frig holes is astoundingly bad, and you should probably stick to 4chan. |
|
|
| |
|